The franchise is called “Good Dogs.” Simply put, it’s a way for us to tell stories about great hunting dogs in all content forms: narratives, video, and photography. The genesis of this idea is pretty simple: Field & Stream readers absolutely love stories about good dogs. More often than not, those stories are heartbreakers about dogs that have died. (Here’s amodern example. Here’s aclassic from the archives.) Stories like those—about dogs we’ve lost—should be a big part of “Good Dogs.” But, in the interest of not making this franchise too depressing, we will also tell stories about good dogs that are still alive and thriving.
The franchise is called “Good Dogs.” Simply put, it’s a way for us to tell stories about great hunting dogs in all content forms: narratives, video, and photography. The genesis of this idea is pretty simple: Field & Stream readers absolutely love stories about good dogs. More often than not, those stories are heartbreakers about dogs that have died. (Here’s amodern example. Here’s aclassic from the archives.) Stories like those—about dogs we’ve lost—should be a big part of “Good Dogs.” But, in the interest of not making this franchise too depressing, we will also tell stories about good dogs that are still alive and thriving.
The franchise is called “Good Dogs.” Simply put, it’s a way for us to tell stories about great hunting dogs in all content forms: narratives, video, and photography. The genesis of this idea is pretty simple: Field & Stream readers absolutely love stories about good dogs. More often than not, those stories are heartbreakers about dogs that have died. (Here’s amodern example. Here’s aclassic from the archives.) Stories like those—about dogs we’ve lost—should be a big part of “Good Dogs.” But, in the interest of not making this franchise too depressing, we will also tell stories about good dogs that are still alive and thriving.
